|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Viktorová Lucie, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Smékalová Eleonora, PhDr. Ph.D.
|
|
Course content
|
The content of the course is to get acquainted with selected topics in Educational Psychology. Within the meeting of combined students there will be a workshop on a selected topic (Feuerstein's instrumental enrichment with an invited lecturer). Due to a single meeting, ABSENCE will NOT BE ALLOWED.
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
Dialogic Lecture (Discussion, Dialog, Brainstorming), Work Activities
- Semestral Work
- 13 hours per semester
- Preparation for the Course Credit
- 26 hours per semester
- Homework for Teaching
- 3 hours per semester
- Attendace
- 8 hours per semester
|
|
Learning outcomes
|
Broaden and deepen knowledge in the field of educational psychology.
-student gain a broader and deeper insight in the education and training -will be more focused on issues of application of educational psychology in practice
|
|
Prerequisites
|
Passing the course Introduction to educational psychology, interest in the issue.
|
|
Assessment methods and criteria
|
Student performance, Dialog
participation in the seminar (zero absence) - uploading an individual and group task to Moodle no later than 4.5. - choose one of these variants: a) Conducting an interview with the teacher at the chosen primary or secondary school in order to find out what are the current conditions of his / her work, with what he / she is satisfied and what he / she would like to improve. For orientation questions, see the template in Moodle, there are no limits to additional questions. Transcription range min. 3600 characters, max. 7200 characters. You should not be a teacher, it should be at least a colleague from school or an acquaintance ... b) Minutes from the observation of teaching at primary or secondary schools in the current (online) situation, in order to describe the method of teaching, the teacher's approach and the form of communication with students, or and parents. For landmarks, see the template in Moodle, there are no limits to other observations. Transcription range min. 3600 characters, max. 7200 characters. The school may or may not be "alternative" in some way. c) An interview with one of the children/adolescents in your family (or with acquaintances, friends,...), how their teaching is currently going, how they perceive it, what they think is OK and what they would like to change about their specific teaching, again in scope of transcription min. 3600 characters, max. 7200 characters. (There is no template here, but you can be inspired by the previous ones.)
|
|
Recommended literature
|
-
Gray, P. (2016). Svoboda učení. Jak nechat děti rozhodovat o svém vzdělávání.. Praha.
-
Jedlička,R. a kol. Mládež v obtížných životních situacích. Praha: Themis, 2004.
-
Kolář, M.. (1997). Skrytý svět šikanování ve školách, Portál 1997..
-
Lang G., Berberichová Ch. Každé dítě potřebuje speciální přístup. Praha: Portál, 1998..
-
Průcha, J. (2011). Alternativní školy a inovace ve vzdělávání. Praha: Portal.
-
ROGERS,C.R., FREIBERG,H.J. (1998). Sloboda učiť sa. Bratislava : Persona.
|