|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Klátik Jaroslav, doc. JUDr. PhD.
-
Vráblová Miroslava, doc. JUDr. PhD.
-
Ščerba Filip, doc. JUDr. Ph.D.
-
Coufalová Bronislava, JUDr. Ph.D.
|
|
Course content
|
unspecified
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
|
Monologic Lecture(Interpretation, Training)
|
|
Learning outcomes
|
The subject represents the basic subject of the second pillar of the study program focused primarily on the development and deepening of the student's knowledge in the field of Criminal Law. The essence of the course is the development of the student's ability to correctly analyze the legal case, determine the legal standards that apply to the case, and the ability to correctly apply the selected legal standards. Students must also be able to present their legal case scientifically. Therefore, the prerequisites of the subject are mastery of the Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of Law and the Scientific and Pedagogical Propaedeutics. The essence of the course is the participation of the student in professional seminars, where students receive a complex criminal case. This case has to be solved by self-study according to the requirements of the seminar tutor and then presented to the lecturer not only to the teacher but also to the other students of the study program so that they will succeed in the subsequent scientific discussion that will provoke their solution. The presentation of the solution emphasizes the presentation of selected methodological procedures, as well as literature and case law, which the student used in the solution. The seminar is conceived as a four-semester course, with emphasis on selected institutes of criminal law within each semester. The fourth semester focuses primarily on the area of procedural criminal law, specifically on the issue of remedies and special forms of criminal proceedings, but given that the degree program is a graduate of the Master's degree program, it is assumed knowledge of the entire issue of criminal law and with emphasis on all context of the problem solved, including the substantive context.
Students who have completed this course will gain the knowledge necessary to understand the features of law.
|
|
Prerequisites
|
Completion of this course is conditional upon the completion of the courses Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of Law I., II. and Scientific and Pedagogical Propedeutics I., II. and Criminal Law Seminar I. -III.
KTP/DFMZ1 and KTP/DFMZ2 and KTP/DFMZ3 and KTP/DFMZ4 and KPO/DVPP1 and KPO/DVPP2 and KPT/DOST1 and KPT/DOST2 and KPT/DOST3
|
|
Assessment methods and criteria
|
Written exam
Active participation in 80% of seminars (full-time students) including presentations on a given topic. The student of combined form of study must attend at least 30% of seminars and two-hour individual consultations.
|
|
Recommended literature
|
-
Císařová, D., Fenyk, J., Gřivna, T. (2015). Trestní právo procesní. 6. vydání. Praha: Wolters Kluwer.
-
Jelínek, J. a kol. (2016). Trestní právo procesní. 4. vydání.. Praha: Leges.
-
Miřička, A. (1932). Trestní právo procesní. Praha: Všehrd.
-
Musil, J. a kol. (2007). Kurs trestního práva: trestní právo procesní. 3. přepracované a doplněné vydání.. C. H. Beck, Praha.
-
Pipek, J. (1980). Principy apelace a kasace a jejich uplatnění v odvolání v československém trestním řízení. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
-
Šámal, P. a kol. (2013). Trestní řád. Komentář. 7. vydání. Praha: C. H. Beck.
-
Šámal, P., Musil, J., Kuchta, J. a kol. (2013). Trestní právo procesní. 4. vydání.. Praha: C. H. Beck.
-
Vantuch, P. (2019). Trestní řízení z pohledu obhajoby. 2. vydání. Praha: C. H. Beck.
|