Lecturer(s)
|
-
Závora Jiří, PhDr. Ph.D. et Ph.D.
-
Hamuľáková Klára, JUDr. Ph.D.
|
Course content
|
1) Expert activity legal regulation, conceptual features 2) The expert versus expert witness, expert registered in list and institute ad hoc 3) Forensic institute, inspection examination and expert accountability 4) expert opinion, its form, content and meaning in professional context 5) Expert evidence and the expert appointment, expert task and evidence evaluation by the court 6) The reward of experts, reimbursement, deciding on the reward 7) Selected practice problems - limiting initiative expert evidence in civil proceedings 8) Selected practice problems - the specifics of forensic disciplines 9) Selected practical issues - expertise borders in the evaluation of expert opinion as evidence 10) Conclusions, exam
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
Monologic Lecture(Interpretation, Training)
|
Learning outcomes
|
This course deals with the issue of expert evidence in civil proceedings. Problems are presented in the context of the law and expertise. Besides the basic framework, providing information about the expert, expert work, expert opinion, during the expert evidence and expert fees, the course focuses on selected issues between professional and legal terms and explains the specificity of expert work as professional and regulated by law. Practical examples are given and the case law as well.
Student will understand the basic links between professional and legal level expert examination, expert opinion as a result of the expert examination and expert evidence in civil trial. Student will be able to explain the characteristics of a expert work and their basic consequences when applied in practice.
|
Prerequisites
|
Completion of this course is not conditional upon completion of some other courses.
|
Assessment methods and criteria
|
Student performance
It is essential that those students who would like to pass the course must have the attendance within the scope set by the seminar teacher and they also must succeed in colloquium.
|
Recommended literature
|
-
Dörfl, L. (2009). Zákon o znalcích a tlumočnících: komentář. C. H. Beck.
|