unspecified
1. The doctoral student conducts a written analysis of the six most commonly encountered forms of professional works or communications. The selection is made with regard to relevance to the topic of their own dissertation (1. dissertation, 2. monograph, 3. chapter in a scholarly book, 4. scientific article in an academic journal, 5. conference contribution in proceedings, and 6. poster). In each form, they will specify: - the subject of the work, - its place within the structure of musicology disciplines and with overlaps into non-musicology disciplines, - theoretical foundations (if formulated), - objectives, possibly subdivided objectives of the work, - hypotheses (if established), - applied methods and techniques, - statistical processing of research data (if included), - achieved goals or conclusions, - the applied publication standard (ISO 690, APA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.) 2. The candidate prepares a written description of the proposed dissertation according to the above-mentioned methodological criteria, i.e., they define the subject, its place within the structure of musicology and non-musicology disciplines, theoretical foundations, research goals, hypotheses, working and research methods and techniques, applied statistical methods, achieved goals, possibly conclusions, and the publication standard. 3. They prepare a list of five studied titles related to research methodology. 4. This material is sent electronically to the examiner one week before the examination date.
|