|
Vyučující
|
|
|
|
Obsah předmětu
|
1. introduction to nondomination 2. concept of nondomination according to Philip Pettit 3. nondomination vs non-interference (Pettit) 4.-7. concept of nondomination in history (Skinner) 8. the "genealogical" approach (Skinner) 9. "keeping republican freedom simple" (Pettit vs Skinner) 10.-12. the real-world application possibilities (Martí a Pettit) LITERATURA: Martí, José L., a Philip Pettit. 2010. A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero's Spain. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pettit, Philip. 2002. "Keeping Republican Freedom Simple: On a Difference with Quentin Skinner." Political Theory, 30:3 (červen): 693-716. Pettit, Philip. 2011. "The Instability of Freedom as Noninterference: The Case of Isaiah Berlin." Ethics, 121:4 (červenec): 693-716. Pettit, Philip. 2016. "A Brief History of Liberty - And its Lessons." Journal of Human Development and Capability, 17:1 (leden): 5-21. Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
|
Studijní aktivity a metody výuky
|
|
Přednášení, Dialogická (diskuze, rozhovor, brainstorming), Metody práce s textem (učebnicí, knihou)
|
|
Výstupy z učení
|
Compared to the liberal non-interference, nondomination is a more robust ideal of liberty. It requires not only that multiple "doors" of opportunities are open but also that there is no "doorman" with an arbitrary power to close one or any of the doors. As such, nondomination is a concept useful not only in the contemporary debates about democracy in the age of multinational corporations, but also in framing other power-based relations: such as in a workplace or among men and women. The seminary focuses on the works of the most important contemporary figures in the so-called neo-Roman republican tradition: Quentin Skinner, the historian of ideas, and Philip Pettit, the political philosopher.
The student acquires a good insight into the ideal of nondomination as conceived by the main contemporary figures in the neo-Roman republican tradition, as well as basic insight into certain features of the development of thinking about liberty in the Western history.
|
|
Předpoklady
|
nespecifikováno
|
|
Hodnoticí metody a kritéria
|
Analýza výkonů studenta
reading of the assigned literature active participation in the seminary discussions participation in the final colloquium
|
|
Doporučená literatura
|
|